Gambling games: prohibit or allow

In most gambling games skills are used

The majority of people think that all gambling games are based on luck, and there is no need to be able to do something. But it is not true. There are many types of gambling games, where skills of the gamblers play an important role. The gambler has to know a lot about investments, be able to create a business based on his or her game, be able to act on the stock exchange and many other things.

Some people insist that the real gambling is not associated with the skills. This is false. For example, poker is a game of skill, and you need to have exceptional mathematical ability to play blackjack well. But government is engaged in the organization of lotteries, which are completely unrelated to any skill and absolutely depend on luck.

The bulk of people don't know about this. Some people think that gambling is bad without realizing the following facts:

The majority of people, including the very rich and the middle class, buy lottery tickets and do not consider this as something shameful.

Researches at Boston University in their investigation found that gambling and investing are the same things:

• "Gambling and investment are identical in activities related to betting. Activities related to the risk have been present in American culture throughout the history of the state. At some point, more than 100 years ago, public attitudes towards two types of speculation polarized. Investing started being considered as socially desirable phenomenon, which was supported by law, and gambling was labeled as socially undesirable and therefore prohibited by law. This discrepancy was not based on any logical differences between these two types of activity, but on social classes of people involved in them. It happened so that stockbrokers, stock exchanges and their wealthy clients have benefited from this legal distinction, and the working class, gamblers, casinos and bookmakers have lost."

And this division into "good" and "bad" games spread throughout the world from the United States.

Take a look how dictionaries, such as Dictionary.com, Oxford Dictionary interpret the words "gamble" and "gambling".

• "Any matter or thing involving risk or hazardous uncertainty".
• "To stake or risk money, or anything of value, on the outcome of something involving chance".
• "Take risky action in the hope of a desired result".
• "A risky action undertaken with the hope of success".

There are the following examples of using these words:

• "They gambled their money on cards".
• "This book offers a concise and to-the-point directory for anyone who gambles on the Internet or is interested in gambling on the Internet".
• "He's extremely talented and has good drive and business sense, but this is a gamble and could leave me in a bit of financial trouble if it fails".
• "He was gambling on the success of his satellite TV channel".
• "Investors began gambling on future returns and more patterns emerged".
• "We decided to take a gamble and offer him a place on our staff".

Thus, it appears that people gamble permanently, even when they do not know it. Some people claim that they do not like gambling, but, nevertheless, the majority of people in the world are gamblers, including those who think that they are not.

The more precise definition of gambling provides that this activity should include the following things: share, chance, profit or loss. Even taking into account these corrections, most of the activities are actually considered as gambling, because they are associated with a particular attribute of gambling. These include extremely important things, such as:

• Selling
• Marketing
• Investing
• Insurance
• Foundation of the business
• Drilling for oil
• Mining

Comparison of gambling activities

Any activity in the figure below includes attributes that define gambling: share, chance, profit or loss. Only the ratio of "skill-luck" is changing.

Social and economic importance of gambling

In general, humanity can not function without gambling. Gambling is not bad and not good, it just forms an inherent part and parcel of our life. Without gambling the following things can not happen:

• discovery of the New World by Europeans. Christopher Columbus and Spain risked greatly trying to find wealth in India, and zigzag of success brought them to America;
• attraction of investments by companies;
• hedging and planning ahead planting crops by farmers;
• supply of your car with oil and gasoline, as well as provision with hundreds of other things that you are using and which are made from petroleum;
• foundation of business and economic activities;
• Invention of the light bulb, car or computer, because inventors would not waste there time unless they hope to make huge profits.

Elements of gambling (share, chance, profit or loss) are used in all the above-mentioned examples of human activities.

Significance of bets in gambling

Excitement makes the game much funnier. There is a reason why poker is more popular than the monopoly, scholar or dominoes. This is because it includes playing for money. People have been playing poker for over 180 years. Millions of people play it on a regular basis because they enjoy it, but not because they want to earn a living playing or making money on their friends. Of course, people can play poker for free, but they prefer playing for money, because it is more interesting. Fans can watch poker competitions for free, but millions of gamblers bet money, because it enhances the pleasure.

Who did not play preferans being a student? Everybody played all night long! And we played without money only in the form of training, while waiting for the fourth participant. And when the full team gathered, we played "on the penny". Otherwise, it is not interesting. Or even football with group mates... if a couple of boxes of were staked, the game became much funnier and more exciting! We took great pleasure in the game, because it was finished by drinking beer together despite the result.

Even the stock market provides entertainment. One investor said that he would like to be able to check the prices of his shares every day to watch as they move both up and down. He said that it would be funnier to invest in this way.

Gambling games give people exactly the same thing as the ballet or detectives: fun and entertainment, but there is the only difference: the pleasure is much sharper when you risk your money.

Educational value

Does gambling have educational value? Here is a fragment from the book How to be a Billionaire: Proven Strategies from the Titans of Wealth:

Taste for gambling.

The of interest billionaires on the specific issue of risk to card games, such as poker, is amazing. So, HL Hunt before entering the oil business was forced to support his family with the help of poker winnings after the loss of income from two crops due to the floods. When John Kluge was a student at Columbia University, his obsession with poker attracted unwelcome attention of the authorities. And by the end of the university in 1937, Kluge saved up $7,000. This sum is equivalent to $80,000 if we take into account the purchasing power in 1999.

Bill Gates devoted much of his time in college to poker games before dropping out of Harvard. Carl Icahn made his first investment package by winning $4,000 for six months of his service in the United States Army while playing poker. Kirk Kerkorian provided finance for start-up of the charter airline in the same way. And Warren Buffett used to play bridge. He was skilled enough to play in Corporate America Team, a group of CEOs who had such opponents as a team consisting of members of the British Parliament.

There is no need to be too smart to be able to determine the relationship between the success at the card table and success in financial affairs. Both situations are related to uncertainties and allow receiving the award after calculating the odds. Reckless gamblers can not beat skilled opponents within several hands in a row in poker or compete for many transactions in the business. Victory does not come without detailed analysis, willingness to take risks and faith in your own abilities".

Do As I Say, Not As I Do

US authorities do not actually have very good attitude to private operators of gambling games, except for Las Vegas, Atlantic City and Indian casinos. Nevertheless, they are the biggest promoters and advocates of the worst kind of gambling, i.e. lotteries, which are based on the zero skill and one hundred percent luck. This happens because the government hates competition, and the lottery is its exclusive prerogative. Authorities try to justify this monopoly, stating that they should control this "vice" and prevent the appearance of addicted gamblers. However they spend millions of dollars on advertising to promote this "vice". It is hypocrisy, isn't it?

The following facts are provided in the documentary film Lucky:

• "More than half of all American adults play lottery, making it the most popular form of fee-based entertainment in the country".
• "Each year, Americans spend $7 billion on movie tickets, $16 billion on sports events, $24 billion on the books, $62 billion on lottery tickets".

Sixty two billion lottery industry is much larger than many American industry sectors (not only books, sports and cinema together). The scandalous thing is that the lottery industry is monopolized by the US government!

In 2002, Emily Oster made his PhD titled The Great Dream: Why Do People Play Powerball? And he found that when the Powerball lottery jackpot was at low levels, mostly poor people were buying tickets. When the jackpot grew and reached a peak, the sale of lottery tickets in rich and poor blocks was almost equal! This confirms the fact that gambling is a feature of both poor and rich: most people buy lottery tickets hoping that the possible gain would be their "big dream".

The document of Boston University Law Review titled Regulating Public Morals and Private Markets: Online Securities Trading, Internet Gambling and the Speculation Paradox explains in detail why gambling and investing are identical. The document is large, so we provide our readers only with some interesting fragments:

• "In fact, the stereotype of an investor as a gambler seems particularly well deserved. To gamble is to put something of value at risk on an uncertain outcome; in other words, wagers are economic choices under uncertainty. Under this broad definition, investors gamble with every purchase of a financial instrument".
• "Many gambling games and investments can be described as speculations..."
• "Many investors buy stocks for the same reasons as gamblers choose certain slot machines, lottery numbers, numbers at the roulette table, or make a bet in the bookmaker's office, or drop certain cards in poker".

In fact, the US government cares mainly about how not to lose money. And the use of morality as an excuse when it bans private operators of online gambling is only a cover for the real reason, i.e. to exclude competition.

In addition to considerable amounts of money that the US government receives from lotteries, there are also fees and taxes, which the Nevada government collects from casinos. According to the site gambling-law-us.com, fees may be more than $1,000,000 and taxes may be up to several million dollars. Some organizations in other industries pay the government the same money just to stay in business. We can assume that the US government wants to protect this cash cow, because license fees and taxes in other countries are insignificant in comparison with the US. For example, similar fees in Costa Rica provide only a few thousand dollars, and there is absolutely no income tax. It is not surprising that many US online gambling operators prefer opening their establishments there.

It turns out that the American government is waging two-front war: as an operator of gambling and as an organization that collects license fees and taxes from gambling operators. What hypocrisy!

Here are some more quotes from the review of Boston University:

• "The federal government should prohibit, regulate, leave alone or encourage speculative [gambling]activities on the basis of the utility of the enterprise, taking into account relevant social costs of these activities, rather than on the principle of obtaining the greatest benefits by the government".
• "Despite the fact that the moralistic rhetoric prevails in the struggle against gambling, the abundance of legal gambling games in almost all countries of the world weakens the authority of the myths that the government policy on gambling is based on morality".
• "The position of the government relating to online investing is absurd. The alleged challenges for reckless retail investors are greatly understated, and for gambling the alleged problems for careless gamblers are significantly overstated".
• "The hostile position of the US government to Internet gambling is wrong, the arguments in favor of the ban are pretentious, and short-sightedness of the government in this area affects its credibility on the international scene".
• "Any attempt to alienate all kinds of gambling (starting from slot machines and ending with sports betting) from other types of investment is illusory ".

The decision to prohibit any activity should be based on a thorough analysis of costs and benefits. Gambling industry should be regulated in the same way as other activities, without taking into consideration the pretentious and contradictory arguments of morality, or as a result of discrimination in relation to a particular social class.

Now the US poor class is discriminated and has less freedom. Democracy is a myth. Free open markets are a myth. The rich and powerful people, who represent only one percent of the society, write laws according to their desires. This is explained in the book "Do not believe everything you see or hear". Here are some quotes:

• "Although, governments have allowed many forms of gambling in the last three decades, the recent campaign against Internet gambling shows that this liberalization does not reflect new obligations to regulate gambling in the same way as other identical activities. Instead, the liberalization of gambling represents a commitment to legalize gambling games that are financially profitable for the state and federal authorities. Internet gambling is not profitable for these regulators, so it is not legalized. Moreover, stating that gambling should not be permitted, regulators appeal to moralistic arguments and do not admit that these same arguments equally apply to the activities of traditional gambling establishments, whose legalization they approved".
• "It is noteworthy that despite the fact that online investing has the same potential for a negative attitude as gambling, online investing has been accepted and even promoted as a new way to invest, whether rational or irrational, in the capital markets. Based on the understanding that online activities should not be regulated in the other ways than physical activities, SEC decided not to restrict online investing. Similarly, online games should be regulated in the same manner as brick and mortar casinos".

In due time the US government considered operations with trading options as gambling and prohibited it, but it made an exception for this financial tool in adoption of anti-online gambling law UIGEA. The government also had considered futures as gambling and prohibited them once, but later legalized them, so farmers could hedge.

In addition, the report from Boston University explains that the insurance activity is also gambling since it also has the same three factors of gambling: share, chance, profit or loss.

Based on the above-mentioned three factors, Spain risked sending three ships in search of a New World. Oil and mining companies are the largest gamblers. They risk millions of dollars every time they drill the well. Sometimes they lose, sometimes they win. All businessmen are also gamblers. They put everything they have, or even take a loan, in the hope that their activities will bring profit, and many of them lose everything. Any business is a gambler.

Thus, most people do not realize that gambling is not immoral, as some think, and the bulk of people are regular gamblers. The definition of "gambling" in modern society has become very limited and includes mainly the activity that we associate with casinos. In fact, there are many activities that can be also considered as gambling, but they selectively taken out of the category of "gambling" for the society. They have just received new names, like secretaries are called "administrative assistant", waiters are "servers" and cleaners become "cleaning services managers" or "aesthetics office manager". Instead of being called "gamblers", people prefer to have names of "entrepreneur", "venture capitalist", "business angel". The names are different, but the essence is the same.

Hypocrisy of the US Government

Let's read clippings from American newspapers:

• "As soon as WTO decided that the United States violated trade rules when they prohibited US online gambling operators under the jurisdiction of Antigua, Americans withdrew their WTO commitments in relation to free trading in this gambling area. Earlier, the European Union and several other countries, including Japan, India and Australia had agreed to accept compensation from the United States for the prohibition of access to their markets".
• "It is time for the United States to stop the hypocritical practice that discriminates foreign online operators in the field of gambling, allowing only American operators to accept bets in certain types of gambling".
• " US laws on remote gambling and their implementation in relation to EU companies constitute an obstacle for trading, which is inconsistent with WTO rules".
• "EU authorities insist that the United States should decide how it is better to regulate Internet gambling on the market, but this must be done in full respect of their obligations under the WTO".

Antigua demands trading sanctions against USA:

• "Antigua asked the WTO to impose sanctions against the United States for ignoring the decision of the WTO on violations of trade rules of the WTO by the United States. The government of the island state reported that it would seek compensation from the World Trade Organization in the amount of approximately $3.4 billion per year".

What do we see? The US government violates the laws of the WTO for its own benefits under the guise of the interests of consumers of online gambling establishments.

Investing in gambling companies

Many people claim that they do not like gambling. Nevertheless, millions of people have been investing in gambling companies on a regular basis for a long period of time. Here is a list of gambling companies whose shares are purchased directly or indirectly through open-end funds, pension funds or hedge funds by millions of investors:

Pinnacle, Cryptologic, MGM, Chartwell, Wynn, Las Vegas Sands, Monarch, Multimedia Games, Melco Entertainment, Boyd Gaming, ShuffleMaster, PokerTek, Entertainment Games, Gaming, Asia Entertainment (Hong Kong company), Isle of Capri, Empire Resorts Caesars, Nevada Gold and Casinos, Entertainment Gaming Asia and many others.

How to deal with it? The US government encourages the development of gambling companies and at the same time prohibits their activities. Where is the logic?

Money laundering

The US government complains that people launder money on the gambling sites. We do not justify money laundering. However the struggle with money laundering should not be motivated by the money itself. If the country is losing money then yes, it's a fight against money laundering. If a country gets the money then it's not a fight.

According to CalvinAyre.com, the global market of online gambling generates $30 billion in gross revenue. And according to MarketWatch.com, the People's Bank of China (PBC) announced that Chinese corrupt officials had stolen $123.7 billion, which was four times more that the revenue from online gambling. And where is the money laundered? - Of course, in the US, India, Australia and Europe. "The People's Bank of China emphasized in its report that the more close collaboration with foreign governments was planning to prevent officials from escaping with stolen money". But instead of fighting against money laundering by corrupt Chinese officials, the United States and other countries are greeting them with open arms and offering visas, if they have a certain amount of money. Elite and expensive real estate in Australia, India and the United States has recently been purchased by the Chinese citizens. In this way the fight against money laundering occurs in real life.

Do not believe everything you see or hear

People complain of the "gambling problem", they complain about the fact that users of online casinos may lose too much money. Maybe this problem exists. However millions of Americans have lost much more money on real estate and stock markets. It is even ridiculous to compare these losses. If these self-appointed moral authorities are concerned that others lose money, they should forbid people to purchase investment assets or shares. They should also prohibit millions of entrepreneurs, because every year, most of them lose their business. They should prohibit organizing new companies, because according to the statistics 90% of will become bankrupt! Millions of financial traders, speculators, entrepreneurs and business owners are losing money (and earning money!) at the moment. Protect them! Prohibit them!

And let's see, who forbids us "to pick own noses". One of the opponents of online gambling, who assures us that he cares about other people who lose too much money is Sheldon Adelson, CEO of Las Vegas Sands. Here is a quote from Forbes:

Sheldon Adelson, the fifth richest man in the United States and chief executive of casino holding, is also one of the largest political donors. The man who had hired an army of lawyers and lobbyists in Washington and state capitals, told FORBES, that he would "spend whatever it takes" to ban online gambling in America. His advocacy group, the Coalition to Stop Internet Gambling, is trying to obtain the signature of the State Attorney General under the petition against online gambling. He hired the former New York Governor George Pataki, the former senator from Arkansas Blanche Lincoln and the former mayor of Denver, Wellington Webb to make efforts to lobby his offer. But if Andelson pays them, how can we believe in their words? Of course, ignorant, ordinary people will think that Pataki, Lincoln and Webb speak according to their moral convictions and really take care about gamblers. But in fact, they say things that are indicated by the purse of Sheldon Adelson. According to Huffington Post, the average income of the head of the lobby group in the US is $1,930,000. This money is a drop in the ocean for Adelson. But for this amount you can oblige people to say or do everything. Some are even ready to sell their kidneys or kill for a less amount.

According to the NY Daily News, the salary of the governor of New York State is $179,000. Do you think that Pataki as a lobbyist for $1,930,000 would do less or more than when he was a governor, obtaining $179,000? It is a silly question, of course... People who really believe in something, will do it for free. Some of them are even willing to go to jail or die for their beliefs. If these lobbyists really believe in what they preach, then let's see how they will preach without salary".

It sounds fantastic, doesn't it? The man who earned billions of dollars on people who played in his casinos cares that users of online casinos might lose too much money! So why does he want to ban online gambling? Maybe he saw what the Internet had made with many with brick and mortar businesses, book publishing, newspapers, movies, etc. Maybe his experts believe that gambling in brick and mortar casinos will share the same fate. Maybe he was more concerned the fact that not users of online casinos might lose too much money, but he might lose too much.

They complain that children may play in online casinos. We do not justify it, but teenagers are spending more money on clothes, entertainment, cars and beer than gambling. In addition, there is software that allows parents to monitor what their children on the Internet. Besides, there are other things that are potentially much more harmful to children, but they are not prohibited: alcohol, knives, drugs, needles, poisonous chemicals and violence on TV (especially in the news). All these things can be found in any home. If the parents can not trust their children and keep online gambling away from them, how can they keep in their house all these deadly things? Have you ever heard the horror stories about teenagers who visited the site of online gambling? And how many stories have you heard about a teenager who took his father's car to ride and had an accident? Every year, teenagers kill themselves and thousands of people in car accidents. Why these self-appointed moral authorities do not lobby for the prohibition of cars or toxic cleaners and detergents, which become poisons for many children? What is worse? Is it worse when children gamble on the Internet or when they die from household items?

In this world there are no perfect things without flaws. For example, mobile phones improve the quality of life, but they distract people and cause car accidents. However cell phones are not prohibited. Driving a car is a useful activity, but it has side effects. According to statistics, about 34,000 Americans are killed in car accidents every year. But the government does not prohibit driving. And how many people die from gambling per year? If it is really such a big problem, why the government does not ban lotteries, which can be considered as the worst form of gambling? Why does the government encourage them?

As in any field of business, when Sheldon Adelson or the US government diminishes or eliminates competition, they create a monopoly or oligopoly. The only people who suffer from this are the consumers, because they get less choice and higher prices. According to Wikipedia, 50% of the gross revenue of state lotteries goes to the state. Have you ever seen an online casino with a 50% advantage in any game?! So next time when you hear someone cares that you can lose a lot of money in online casinos, you have to ask yourself whether he cares about your or thinks of his profits. In fact, you are oppressed. The forces acting against you, such as AGA or Sheldon Adelson, hate competition and want to limit your choices. They believe that they know what is better for you. They believe that you are not smart enough to think for yourself. There are many people like Sheldon Adelson, who lobby their interests at the expense of ordinary people. And the government treats you like a child, because it does not believe that you can think and be responsible for your own actions.

What do you think about the prohibition of gambling?